Chapted 26: Update per thread feedback

26_Migrations_in_the_XIXth_and_XXth_century__contribution_to_capitalisms_history_Caroline_Andréani.tex

@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ Men have always migrated and one can legitimately ask the question of why capita
 Wouldn't this be a view of the mind, a bias against a system that, after all, only takes advantage of a natural phenomenon attested since prehistoric times, human migrations?
 
 Traditionally, migration historians have broken down the causes of migration into two poles: repulsive causes and attractive causes.
-Repulsive causes are the set of reasons that can push individuals to leave their place of life: misery, famines, wars, political or religious conflicts.
+Repulsive causes are the set of reasons that can push individuals to leave their place of living: misery, famines, wars, political or religious conflicts.
 Attractive causes are the search for new land and the attraction of fortune. The same then make subtle distinctions between \enquote{spontaneous} and organized migrations.
 
 Such definitions obviously guide the perception that one can have of migratory phenomena. First, repulsive causes and attractive causes combine in the majority of cases.
@@ -127,7 +127,7 @@ The majority of Irish migrants embarked for the United States\footnote{Between 1
 From then on, migratory flows shifted towards Great Britain.  The United States offered greater opportunities for promotion and social success than England. 
 They also showed greater religious tolerance than England, a colonizing country - Ireland would gain its independence in 1921 - and an oppressor.
 
-In 1890, the Irish outnumbered the irish outside the country than in Ireland itself.
+In 1890, Irish people outside the country outnumbered Irish people in Ireland itself.
 
 Throughout the nineteenth century, the Irish developed a culture of emigration. 
 The price of the boat for the crossing of the United States was collected at the level of the family network and the neighborhood.