Initial commit

This is what was posted to the thread on 2022-08-19
https://leftypol.org/leftypol/res/1122230.html#1126029

.gitignore

@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
+bboc.aux
+bboc.log
+bboc.pdf
+bboc.toc

bboc.tex

@@ -0,0 +1,223 @@
+\documentclass{book}
+
+\title{The Black Book of Capitalism}
+\author{Based BBOC Anon}
+\date{\today}
+
+\begin{document}
+
+\maketitle
+
+\tableofcontents
+
+\chapter{Foreword}
+
+Blessed capitalism! It announces nothing and never promises.
+No manifesto or twenty-point declaration programming the
+turnkey happiness. He crushes you, guts you, enslaves you, torments you — in short, does it disappoints you? You have the right to be unhappy but not not disappointed, because disappointment presupposes a betrayed commitment.
+
+Those who announce a more just, shining future expose themselves to the accusation
+of deception when the attempt sinks into an awful cacophony.
+Capitalism, on the other hand, wisely conducts with the present. It is. The future? He willingly abandons it to dreamers, ideologues, and ecologists. And so its crimes are almost perfect. No written record establishing premeditation. 
+
+For the Terror of 1793, it is easy for those who do not like revolutions to imagine its culprits: the Enlightenment and the unreasonable will to order society according to reasoning reason.
+For communism, libraries crumble under the incriminating works. Nothing like this for capitalism. It is not to it that we can reproach manufacturing misfortune by pretending to bring happiness. It agrees to be judged only on this which has always motivated it: the search for maximal profit in minimal time. The others are interested in man; It only concerns itself with goods.
+
+Have we ever seen happy or unhappy goods? The only worthwhile reviews are balance sheets. To speak about crimes is irrelevant. Let us talk about natural disasters. We tell you enough:
+capitalism is the natural state of humanity. Humanity is in capitalism like a fish in the air. It takes the futile arrogance of ideologues to want to change the order of things, with the sad cyclical consequences that we know: revolution, repression, disappointment, contrition. This is the true original sin of man: that perpetual agitation that leads him to shake the yoke, the lyrical illusion of a future freed from exploitation, the claim to change the natural order.
+
+Don't move: capitalism moves for you. But hey, nature has its disasters; capitalism too. Would you look for those responsible for an earthquake, a tidal wave? Furthermore, crime involves criminals. 
+For communism, the anthropometrics cards are easy to establish: two bearded guys, a goatee, some four-eyes, a mustache having man, one that crosses the Yangtze River by swimming, a cigar lover, etc. We can hate these faces. They incarnate.
+ 
+When it comes to capitalism, there are only indexes: Dow Jones, CAC 40, Nikkei, etc. Just try to hate an index. The Evil Empire still has a geographical area, capitals. It is trackable. Capitalism is everywhere and nowhere. To whom should summonses be sent before a possible Nuremberg tribunal?
+
+Capitalism? Cheesy archaism! Get up to date and use the right word: liberalism. The Littré defines "liberal" as "that which is worthy of a free man." Doesn't that sound good? And The Petit Robert gives us a convincing list of antonyms: "stingy, autocrat, dictatorial, dirigiste, fascist, totalitarian. You may have found excuses to define yourself as anti-capitalist, but admit that it would take vice to proclaim yourself anti-liberal.
+
+So what is this black book of capitalism all about?
+Can't you see the madness in this project's excesses?
+The worst mass murderer in history, we grant you, but an assassin without a face or genetic code and who has been operating with impunity since centuries on five continents… We wish you a lot of fun. And what's the point? Haven't you heard the final gong announcing at the same time the end of the match and the end of history? It won. It monopolizes in its robust mafia-like version the remains of its enemies. Which credible opponent on the horizon?
+
+Which opponent? The immense people of the civil parties to the trial. The dead and the living. The innumerable crowd of those who were deported from Africa to the Americas, chopped in the trenches of a foolish war, grilled alive by napalm, tortured to death in the jails of capitalism's watchdogs, shot at the Federated Wall, shot at Fourmies, shot at Setif, massacred by hundreds of thousands in Indonesia, almost eradicated like the American Indians,  massively murdered in China to ensure the free circulation of opium…
+Of all these, the hands of the living have received the torch of revolt of the man whose dignity have been denied. Soon inert hands of those children of the Third World whom malnutrition, every day, kills by tens of thousands, emaciated hands of the peoples condemned to repay the interest on a debt whose capital their puppet leaders have stolen, trembling hands of the excluded ever more numerous to camp on the margins of opulence.
+Hands tragically weak, and disunited for now. But they cannot but join one day. And on that day, the torch that they carry will set the world ablaze.
+
+Gilles Perrault
+
+\chapter{Introduction}
+
+\section{THE TOTALITARIAN LIBERALISM}
+
+The world dominated by capitalism is the free world, capitalism, which is now called only liberalism, is the modern world.
+It is the only model of society, if not ideal, at least satisfactory. There is and will never be another.
+This is the unanimous song sung not only by economic leaders and most politicians,
+but also intellectuals and journalists with access to the mainstream media: television, press, large publishers, usually in the hands of industrial or financial groups.
+Dissident thought is not forbidden (liberalism obliges!) but channeled into a quasi-clandestine way.
+So much for the freedom of expression that the proponents of our liberal system gargle about.
+The virtue of capitalism is in its economic efficiency. But for whose benefit and at what cost?
+
+In Western countries, which are the showcase of capitalism while the rest of the world is rather its back room, let us look at the facts.
+After its great period of expansion in the nineteenth century, due to industrialization and the ferocious exploitation of workers, the movement that has accelerated over the last few decades has led to the virtual disappearance of the small peasantry devoured by large farms, with the consequence of pollution, the destruction of landscapes and the degradation of the quality of products (and this taxpayer's money since agriculture has not ceased to be subsidized), the virtual disappearance of small local shops, particularly food outlets, in favour of large retailers and hypermarkets, the concentration of industries into large national and then transnational firms which take on such proportions that they sometimes have larger treasuries than those of states and make the law (or claim to do so), taking steps to strengthen their power
+without control, such as with the Multinational Agreement on Investment (MAI) over states. (United Fruit is the patron of several Latin American states.)
+
+The capitalist leaders could fear that the disappearance of the small peasantry,
+of the crafts and the industrial and commercial petty bourgeoisie would strengthen the ranks of the proletariat.
+But "modernism" has provided them with the parade with automation, miniaturization, computing.
+After the depopulation of the fields, we are witnessing the depopulation of factories and offices.
+As capitalism does neither know or wants to share profit and work (we see this with the indecent and hysterical reactions of the bosses on the 35 hours, a measure that is nevertheless very meek) we inevitably arrive at unemployment and its cohort of social disasters.
+
+The more unemployed, the less compensation is paid and the shorter the time. The fewer workers there are, the more pensions are planned.
+This seems logical and inevitable. Yes, if solidarity is distributed over wages.
+But if we take into account the gross national product which has increased by more than 40\% in less than twenty years while the wage bill has continued to decrease, it is quite different!
+But this is not in the capitalist logic! Nearly twenty million unemployed in Europe, this is the positive result of capitalism!
+
+And the worst is yet to come. Major European and American firms whose profits have never been so prosperous announce
+layoffs by the hundreds of thousands. It is necessary to "rationalize" production, competition obliges!
+The increase in foreign investment in France is applauded.
+In addition to the dangers to national independence, it is questionable whether it is not the fall in wages that encourages investors.
+The French champions of liberalism — of "modernism"! — (see Alain Madelin!) swear by England and the United States 
+who would be the champions of economic success and the fight against unemployment.
+If the destruction of social protections, the precariousness of employment, 
+low wages and the short-term non-compensation of the unemployed which makes them disappear from the statistics are Mr Madelin's ideal,
+I do not think it is the ideal of the workers of this country.
+
+In the USA, a paradise of capitalism, 30 million inhabitants (more than 10\% of the population) live below the poverty line, and among these blacks are in the majority.
+The supremacy of the United States in the world, the imperialist and standardizing spread of its way of life and culture can only satisfy servile spirits.
+Europe would do well to be careful and react, as it still has the economic means to do so. But it would also need the political will.
+To assist productive investment in industry or services, capitalism has the will to make them competitive in the face of short-term financial and speculative investments.
+How so? By taxing the latter? Not at all, we lower salaries and social charges!
+It is also a way of making the West competitive with the Third World. In Great Britain, they started to make children work again.
+The vassal of the United States, nor his overlord, has not ratified the charter prohibiting child labor.
+Caught in the infernal circle of competition, the Third World will have to lower costs and push its inhabitants a little further into misery, then it will be the turn of the West again…
+Until the whole world is in the hands of a few transnationals, mostly American, and that we hardly need any more workers, except an elite of technicians…
+The problem then will be for capitalism to find consumers beyond this elite and its shareholders… and to maintain delinquency born of poverty.
+
+The accumulation of money—which is only an abstraction—prevents the production of capital goods and elementary goods useful to all.
+The black book of capitalism is already written before us in its "paradise". What about his hell, the Third World?\footnote{In the dictionary of the twentieth century (Fayard), Jacques Attali puts forward the figure of one in four people living in the US below the poverty line. Worldwide, nearly 3 billion people have less than \$2 per day, 13 million die of hunger every year and two-thirds of the world's hands do not benefit from any social protection.}
+The ravages of colonialism and neo-colonialism in a century and a half are incalculable, nor can the millions of deaths attributable to it be quantified.
+All the major European countries and the United States are guilty.
+
+Slavery, ruthless repression, torture, appropriation, theft of land and natural resources by major Western, American or transnational companies or by local potentates in their pay, creation or artificial carving up of countries, imposition of dictatorships, monoculture replacing traditional food crops, destruction of ancestral ways of life and cultures, deforestation and desertification, ecological disasters, famine, exile of populations to megacities where unemployment and misery await them.
+The structures that the international community has set up to regulate the development of industries or trade are entirely in the hands and at the service of capitalism:
+the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, the World Trade Organization.
+These bodies have only served to indebt the countries of the Third World and to impose on them the liberal creed.
+If they have allowed the development of insolent local fortunes, they have only increased the misery of the populations\footnote{Read Philippe Panure, Le Village monde et son château (World village and its castle), le Temps des Cerises, 1995.}.
+
+In a few decades, international capitalism will hardly need labor anymore, automation obliges!
+American laboratories study in vitro cultures, which will definitively ruin the agricultural Third World (and perhaps French agriculture, the world's second largest exporter).
+Instead of sharing the goods, it will be unemployment that workers around the world will definitively share\footnote{Read Jeremy Rifjin, La fin du travail (The End of Work), La Découverte, 1996.}.
+Yet essential services concerning education, health, environment, culture, mutual assistance will not be provided or will no longer be provided because they do not generate profits and are of no interest to the private sector, because they can only be provided by the States or the community of citizens to whom liberalism wants to remove all power and all means.
+
+What are the means of expansion and accumulation of capitalism?
+War (or protection, like the mafia), repression, dispossession, exploitation, usury, corruption, propaganda.
+
+The war against indocile countries that do not respect Western interests.
+What was once the prerogative of England and France, Africa and Asia (the last upheavals of colonialism in India, Madagascar,  Indochina, Algeria caused millions of deaths), is today that of the USA, a nation that claims to rule the world.
+To this end, the United States has not ceased to practice a policy of over-armament (which it forbids to others).
+We have seen this imperialism exercised in all direct or indirect interventions of the United States in Latin America and particularly in Central America. (Nicaragua, Guatemala, El Salvador, Honduras, Grenada), Asia, Vietnam, Indonesia, Timor (genocide proportionally greater than that of khmer rouge in Cambodia — nearly two-thirds of the population — genocide perpetrated in indifference — if not with complicity — of the West), Gulf War, etc.\footnote{Read Noam Chomsky, Les Dessous de la politique de l'Oncle Sam (Uncle Sam's backstage of politics), Écosociété, EPO, le Temps des Cerises, 1996.}.
+War is not only fought by arms but can take new forms:for example, the United States did not hesitate to help the Moon sect in Korea to fight against communism, the fascists in post-war Italy, they have not hesitated to arm or subsidize Islamic fundamentalists like the Muslim Brotherhood or the Taliban in Afghanistan.War can also take the form of embargoes against indocile states (Cuba, Libya, Iraq), oh so deadly for the populations (several hundred thousand, even millions of dead in Iraq).
+
+Spoliation is the obvious reason of the use of force. If you want to rob a house where the inhabitants are, it is better to have a weapon.
+The practices of capitalism are close to those of the mafia, which is probably why the latter proliferates so well in its the former's soil.
+Like the mafia, capitalism protects docile rulers who shamelessly let their country be exploited by large American and transnational corporations.
+It thus consolidates — when it does not set them up — dictatorships, which are more effective in protecting corporate assets than democracies.
+Its weapons are indifferently democracy or dictatorship, trading or gangsterism, intimidation or murder.
+Thus, the CIA is arguably the largest criminal organization in the world.
+
+Usury, another mafia process: like the mafia lends to the merchant who can never pay his debt and ends up losing his shop (or life),
+countries are encouraged to invest, often artificially, and weapons are sold to them to help fight indocile states,
+and they must repay eternally the accumulated interest on the debt, this way you become master of their economy.
+Repression and exploitation go hand in hand: anti-union repression (which was once legal), now unacknowledged but still practised in companies,
+repressive surveillance, criminal employers' militias\footnote{Read Marcel Caille, Les Truands du patronat (Bosses's thugs), Éditions sociales, 1977.}, unions initiated by the bosses (CFT) and repression against any radical workers' protest\footnote{Read Maurice Rajsfus, La police hors la loi (The Outlaw Police). Le Cherche-midi, 1996.}.
+This is the price to pay to make exploitation possible.
+
+And we know, since Marx, that the exploitation of labor is the engine of capitalism.
+Western economies benefit from slavery in the Third World and from the serfdom of illegal immigrants in Western countries.
+
+Corruption: Multinationals have such financial or political influence or pressure on all public or private officials that they stifle all resistance in their octopus tentacles.
+
+Propaganda: to impose its creed and justify weapon stockpiling, its criminal acts and its bloody crimes, capitalism always invokes generous ideals:
+defense of democracy, freedom, struggle against the "communist" dictatorship, defense of the values of the West,
+while it most often defends only the interests of a propertied class, that it wants to seize raw materials,
+govern oil production or control strategic locations.
+This propaganda is propagated by economic and political rulers, a servile press and media.
+These are the watchdogs already denounced by Nizan, the Betrayal of the clerics vilified by Julien Benda\footnote{Read Serge Halimi, Les Nouveaux Chiens de garde, Liber — Raison d'agir, 1997.}.
+
+Supporters of liberalism, lauders of the United States, I have not heard your voice speak out against the destruction of Vietnam, the Indonesian genocid,
+the atrocities perpetrated in the name of liberalism in Latin America, against American aid to Pinochet's coup d'état, which was one of the bloodiest in history\footnote{Read Chili, Le Dossier noir, (Chile,  the black file) Gallimard, 1974.},
+the killing of Turkish trade unionists; your indignation was somewhat selective, Solidarność but not the Disk, Budapest but not Algeria, Prague but not Santiago, Afghanistan but not Timor,
+I did not see you indignant when communists or simply those who wanted to give power to the people or defend the poor were killed.
+For your complicity or silence, I do not hear you asking for forgiveness.
+
+\chapter{Capitalism's origin}
+
+It was during the nineteenth century that capitalism, based on wage labour, became the dominant mode of production, first in
+Western Europe and the United States, then subordinating the whole world, by either indirect or direct forms of domination (colonization).
+
+Its genesis essentially ran its course over the previous three centuries (sixteenth, seventeenth and eighteenth centuries).
+This is, to use adam Smith's terminology, taken up by Marx, the era of "primitive accumulation." (or better, to make Adam Smith's term more accurate, "Previous accumulation").
+How will capitalists (who possess the wealth likely to be converted into means of production (machines, raw materials, etc.))  and  "proletarians",
+(devoid of any autonomous means of subsistence and reduced, in order to survive, to become the wage-earners of the previous ones) will end up facing one another?
+
+Bourgeois ideology, which is expressed among political "thinkers" and vulgar economists of the nineteenth century, tells us that originally, society has been divided into two categories: 
+Some are laborious, intelligent, thrifty
+Some others lazy, squandering.
+%«
+"It goes without saying that some piled treasure on treasure, while the others soon found themselves devoid of everything."\footnote{Capital, book I, tome III, Paris, Éditions sociales, 1950, p. 153.}
+%»
+Karl Marx cites, among the authors developing this thesis, M. Thiers\footnote{Ibid., p. 153. Adolphe Thiers, De la propriété, Paris, 1848.}.
+In the twentieth century, the good doctor Alexis Carrel, Nobel Prize in medicine and supporter of Pétain, will explain in L'homme, cet inconnu (Man, the unknown)'\footnote{Dr Alexis Carrel, Man, the unknown, Paris, Plon, 1935.} that the former were genetically superior, and the latter, inferior.
+
+And Karl Marx observes: "In the annals of real history, it is conquest, enslavement, the reign of brute force that has always prevailed."\footnote{Karl Marx, op. cit. cit., p. 164.}
+To study this period, which began with the great maritime discoveries at the end of the fifteenth century, we will use two major sources:
+An old one, the one provided by Karl Marx's Capital in its development on "primitive accumulation" (Book I, VIIIth section)\footnote{Karl Marx, op. cit. cit., pp. 153-22.}.
+The other, more recent, certainly richer in information and more "up-to-date", will be provided by the great work of Fernand Braudel: Material Civilization, Economy and Capitalism, fifteenth-eighteenth century\footnote{Paris, Armand Colin, 3 volumes, 544, 600 and 608 p.}.
+Braudel's point of view, like that of Marx, pays particular attention to the socio-economic infrastructure of history, but differs from it because it does not give a central place to the division of society into opposing classes.
+The confrontation of the two points of view could have been exciting: it is unfortunately absent from the work of Braudel, who obviously had not read Marx (at least that part of Capital that covered the same subject)\footnote{Cf. J. Suret-Canale, "Braudel as seen  by Pierre Daix", La Pensée n° 307, 3rd trimester 1996, pp. 160-161.}.
+
+\section{The market, and the 'antediluvian' forms of Capital}
+
+The class societies that preceded capitalism were characterized by a personal bond from the dominant to the dominated (slave, tributary, serf, etc.).
+
+The dominated was, of course, exploited, and often in the most brutal way, but the exploitation was "justified", at least ideologically, by a certain reciprocity:
+duty of protection on the part of the dominant, even assistance, often under a patriarchal mask.
+With capitalism, social relations take on an increasingly abstract, anonymous aspect. And thereby taking on a dehumanized aspect.
+
+Capitalism develops on the basis of commodity production, and presupposes its generalization.
+Unlike previous modes of production, more or less based on an economy of self-subsistence, capitalist production is turned, from the start, towards the market: the capitalist produces to sell.
+And the very relationship between the capitalist and the wage-earner is in the form of market exchange: the capitalist presents himself as a buyer of labor power, the wage earner as a seller.
+
+The market, the commodity, the commodity production appear very early in the most diverse societies.
+But they are not the exclusive, let alone initial, forms of exchange:
+archaic societies present "non-market" forms of exchange, highlighted since Durkheim.
+Karl Polanyi had the merit of stressing the specificity of these exchanges in relation to market exchange\footnote{Karl Polanyi, Primitive, Archaïc and Modern Economies, (Ed. George Dalton) Boston: Beacon Press, 1968.}.
+
+In "simple" market production, the agricultural or artisanal producer owns his means of production.
+It produces in part or in whole, no longer to directly cover its own needs, but to sell, on a market where products are exchanged
+through monetary equivalents, with producers specializing according to a social division of labor.
+
+With productive capitalism, the capitalist, owner of the means of production (land, machinery, raw materials, etc.)
+"buys" from the worker the use of his labor power for a wage that roughly corresponds to the amount necessary for the reconstitution and reproduction of this labor power;
+This amount being less than what's produced by the implementation of this labour power.
+The supplement thus emerging (Marx's "surplus value" or "surplus value") belongs to the capitalist.
+The capital advanced and implemented in production by the capitalist is thus at the end of the cycle reproduced and increased by a supplement.
+The capitalist can use this supplement for personal consumption, but he can also "accumulate" it in order to increase the mass of his capital. This is "expanded" reproduction.
+
+In earlier societies, the product of exploitation (of the slave, the tributary, the feudal dependent — serf or villain)
+was mainly consumed by the privileged classes and relatively little "reinvested".
+The productive cycle was repeated more or less on the same scale. "Growth," to the extent that it existed, was very slow and almost imperceptible.
+
+In contemporary (productive) capitalism that is being set up thanks to the industrial revolution, with the widespread use of mechanical energy,
+advances in labour productivity will allow for "expanded reproduction" on an increasingly broad scale, in short, "growth."
+
+This productive capitalism appeared as early as the Middle Ages, in an embryonic form, in Italian cities in the form of "manufacture"
+("Factory" practicing in the same place the manual division of labor, or work at home, the capitalist providing the raw material, 
+for example the thread to the weaver, and buying the manufactured product from him).
+
+But, until the end of the eighteenth century, capital was essentially in forms that Marx called "antediluvian",
+market capital or finance capital (usurious) forms that had appeared as early as antiquity.
+
+In these forms, there is also accumulation, but not through the creation of wealth: capital here just to take its tithe from existing production.
+
+The advent of productive capitalism, essentially industrial, in addition to the technical conditions already mentioned, presupposes economic and social conditions.
+
+\end{document}